top of page

Expert Legal Guidance

Statutory Interpretation & Administrative Law

Expert Legal Consulting

Are you facing a legal challenge related to statutory interpretation or administrative law? I can provide expert consulting services to help you navigate these complex matters. With a wealth of experience and knowledge, I can help you achieve a positive outcome.

Recognized Experience

  • Cited by Antonin Scalia & Brian Garner in Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts.

  • Cited in United States v. Thomas, 939 F.3d 1121, 1139, n.14 (10th Cir. 2019) (10th Cir. October 01, 2019) (Matheson, C.J., dissenting).

  • Quoted in Meinhard v. State, 371 P.3d 37, 43 n.5 (Utah 2016).

Former Clients

Greenberg Traurig, LLP 

Williams & Connolly, LLP

Maynard Cooper & Gale, PC (Now Maynard Nexsen)

East-West Management Institute, Inc.

Latest Scholarship

Books:

Cover Image of Statutory Interpretation in the Federal and State Courts
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN THE FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS
Cover Image of MASTERING LEGISLATION, REGULATION, AND STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
MASTERING LEGISLATION, REGULATION, AND STATUTORY INTERPRETATION

Articles:

Interpreting Ambiguous Tax Statutes
  • Published in 2022

The SEC’s Fight to Stop district Courts from Declaring its Hearings Unconstitutional
  • Cited in SEC v. Sargent, No. CV 19-11416-WGY, 2023 WL 4609585, at *2 (D. Mass. July 12, 2023)

You’re Fired! Why the ALJ Multi-Track Dual Removal Provisions Violate the Constitution & How to Fix Them
  • Cited in Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC, 986 F.3d 1173, 1187 (9th Cir. 2021).

The Shadow of Free Enterprise: The Unconstitutionality of the Securities & Exchange Commission’s Administrative Law Judges
  • Co-authored with Moses Tincher

Dodging the Taxman: Why Treasury’s Anti-Abuse Regulation Is Unconstitutional
  • Published in 2015

Codifying and “Miscodifying” Judicial Anti-Abuse Tax Doctrines
  • Cited in Hinsdale Count Board of Equalization v. HDH Partnership, 438 P.3d 742, 748-49 & n.4 (Co. 2019).

  • Cited in Benson v. Commissioner, 887 F.3d, 511, 517 n.3 (1st Circuit 2018).

The Impact of the Rise and Fall of Chevron on the Executive’s Power to Make and Interpret Law
  • Cited in DeCambre v. Brookline Housing Authority, 95 F. Supp. 3d 35, 44 (D. Mass. 2015).

Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: Reconciling Brown v. Gardner’s Presumption that Interpretive Doubt be Resolved in Veterans’ Favor with Chevron’s Second Step
  • Cited in Kisor v. Shulkin, 880 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (O’Malley, C.J., dissenting).

  • Cited in Johnson v. McDonald, 762 F.3d 1362, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (O’Malley, C.J., concurring).

But That Is Absurd! Why Specific Absurdity Undermines Textualism
  • Quoted in United States v. McPherson, 2020 WL 5798492 (A. Ct. Crim. App. 2020).

  • Cited in Brakke v. Iowa Department of Natural Recourses, June 16, 897 N.W.2d 522, 538 (Iowa 2017).

The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims: Has it Mastered Chevron’s Step Zero?
  • Published in 2011

The Art of Statutory Interpretation: Identifying the Interpretive Theory of the Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Published in 2010

Neither Fish nor Fowl: Administrative Judges in the Modern Administrative State
  • Published in 2010

bottom of page